posted by
connielane at 08:45am on 06/03/2006
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
[This post is not directed at anyone in particular. I've seen things all over the 'net about this, not just my flist.]
I may regret doing this, but never can I remember the words "Oscar upset" being more accurate than they were at the end of last night's Oscars, and I think some things need to be said.
First of all, I loved all five of the Best Picture nominees. I thought this was one of the strongest years in quite a while. I would have loved to have seen at least four of the five nominees take the "top" prize (Capote was the weakest, in my opinion, and that's saying a lot for the other four, because Capote was awesome). Brokeback clearly had all the momentum going in last night, but I knew Crash would be the dark horse.
There are a lot of things that go into whether a movie wins Best Picture or not, and many of them have nothing to do with the quality of the film. There are a lot of political machinations, campaigns, and what not, and if your movie peaks at the wrong time, it could mean people voting for something else.
I detest ranking art against art, but personally, if I had been given an opportunity to vote for the Oscars, I would have gone with Munich for Best Picture. I think it was the strongest "total package" of the five. Well written, well acted, beautifully shot, and very timely. But that's just me, and I knew that it was probably the least likely to take home anything, because it was so under-advertised. However, when it came to the two frontrunners, I felt there was a strong possibility for Brokeback NOT to win. In fact, if I had only had those two movies to choose from, I would have picked Crash over Brokeback myself (though it would have been a difficult choice).
For one thing, I think "Brokeback-mania" reached its saturation point too early and people were sick of it. "Brokeback" as a word is now a part of the cultural lexicon. You couldn't go anywhere without hearing a gay cowboy joke. In some ways, it kind of played itself out. Also, as great as I thought it was, it just didn't seem that revolutionary to me.
Crash was a different kind of underdog. It came out early in the year, and it's very rare for the Academy to remember anything that came out before Thanksgiving. It was a very divisive movie - there were people who really loved it and people who thought it was the cinematic antichrist. I think a few things put it ahead of Brokeback (though, I'd bet money that the race was quite close, if we could see the vote percentages).
I'm not saying there aren't some homophobes in the Academy who thought the world wasn't ready for a Best Picture that put homosexuality front and center. But I seriously doubt they're numerous enough to have affected the vote that much. I find accusations that the Academy is somehow sending a message to the gay community - and even more incredibly, that they are condoning and perpetuating homophobia - by not rewarding Brokeback with Best Picture to be utterly ridiculous. And I'm saying this both to the people who are gloating that this is supposedly the case and the people who are angered by it. It's just. Not. True. Would anybody be saying the Academy was perpetuating racism if Crash had not won? Is Kanye West going to go on television and say that the Academy doesn't care about Jewish people because Munich didn't win?
NO!
It just means that there was another movie that people - people who make movies for a living, by the way - thought was better.
I may regret doing this, but never can I remember the words "Oscar upset" being more accurate than they were at the end of last night's Oscars, and I think some things need to be said.
First of all, I loved all five of the Best Picture nominees. I thought this was one of the strongest years in quite a while. I would have loved to have seen at least four of the five nominees take the "top" prize (Capote was the weakest, in my opinion, and that's saying a lot for the other four, because Capote was awesome). Brokeback clearly had all the momentum going in last night, but I knew Crash would be the dark horse.
There are a lot of things that go into whether a movie wins Best Picture or not, and many of them have nothing to do with the quality of the film. There are a lot of political machinations, campaigns, and what not, and if your movie peaks at the wrong time, it could mean people voting for something else.
I detest ranking art against art, but personally, if I had been given an opportunity to vote for the Oscars, I would have gone with Munich for Best Picture. I think it was the strongest "total package" of the five. Well written, well acted, beautifully shot, and very timely. But that's just me, and I knew that it was probably the least likely to take home anything, because it was so under-advertised. However, when it came to the two frontrunners, I felt there was a strong possibility for Brokeback NOT to win. In fact, if I had only had those two movies to choose from, I would have picked Crash over Brokeback myself (though it would have been a difficult choice).
For one thing, I think "Brokeback-mania" reached its saturation point too early and people were sick of it. "Brokeback" as a word is now a part of the cultural lexicon. You couldn't go anywhere without hearing a gay cowboy joke. In some ways, it kind of played itself out. Also, as great as I thought it was, it just didn't seem that revolutionary to me.
Crash was a different kind of underdog. It came out early in the year, and it's very rare for the Academy to remember anything that came out before Thanksgiving. It was a very divisive movie - there were people who really loved it and people who thought it was the cinematic antichrist. I think a few things put it ahead of Brokeback (though, I'd bet money that the race was quite close, if we could see the vote percentages).
1) It was an L.A. picture. Most Academy members are Angelinos, so this picture was bound to resonate with them.
2) It had a huge cast, many of them well-respected actors. Naturally, everyone in it who got to vote would vote for it. And - as a friend of mine pointed out - by voting for Crash, Academy members no doubt felt that they were rewarding as many of "their" people as possible.
3) As an "issues" movie, it was both more pointed and more universal. Preconception is perhaps the most basic problem we face as human beings. Brokeback dealt with this on a small level with homosexuality (i.e., the image of gay men was very non-stereotypical), but it was by no means the focus. This movie shook people and forced many of them to look at their own preconceptions of people. Even the casting of the movie was clearly designed to achieve this.
I'm not saying there aren't some homophobes in the Academy who thought the world wasn't ready for a Best Picture that put homosexuality front and center. But I seriously doubt they're numerous enough to have affected the vote that much. I find accusations that the Academy is somehow sending a message to the gay community - and even more incredibly, that they are condoning and perpetuating homophobia - by not rewarding Brokeback with Best Picture to be utterly ridiculous. And I'm saying this both to the people who are gloating that this is supposedly the case and the people who are angered by it. It's just. Not. True. Would anybody be saying the Academy was perpetuating racism if Crash had not won? Is Kanye West going to go on television and say that the Academy doesn't care about Jewish people because Munich didn't win?
It just means that there was another movie that people - people who make movies for a living, by the way - thought was better.
(mystery)
I personally would have voted for BBM, because it hit me on an emotional level whereas Crash hit me on an intellectual one, but I can't say any of the voters made a bad choice. :-)
(mystery)
(mystery)
(mystery)
(mystery)
Thanks for writing this. I need to see Munich next.
(mystery)
That was always my issue. Not that the film may or may not be relevant, but that so many on both sides wanted everyone to see just how relevant it was. The liberal view was that Brokeback challenged preconceptions and humanised homosexuality. The conservative view was the Brokeback pushed too hard for acceptance of homosexuality as a cultural norm. Somewhere someone decided to market the film as a love story of extreme importance to Society In General.
My post on Friday was trying to address that. Because, really, in the minds of so many people of all persuasions, Brokeback Mountain ceased being a movie and became a rallying standard. It wasn't a Matinee, it was the Dred Scot decision in film form. Ironically, that probably killed any chance it had at winning the Oscar. The Academy (from what I remember) has never liked its chosen films to be too popular.
Even more ironically, Crash's win may save the Acadamy Awards. Everyone hates a foregone conclusion, everyone loves a little surprise and a little triumph-of-the-underdog. I would bet there are others, like me, who have a slightly renewed interest in next year's Oscar Telecast simply because it seems like maybe they will still suprise us.
K
(mystery)
In what world is that a negative message?
I couldn't help but be glad BBM and Houston lad Larry McMurtry won for scriptwriting, though. :)
(mystery)
The Academy is clearly pro-McCarthyism because Good Night and Good Luck didn't win.
Duh.
(mystery)
(mystery)
(mystery)
(mystery)
At least I haven't seen THIS Crash.
i did see the one where people have sex with leg wounds.
I didn't like that one so much.
K
(mystery)
(mystery)
(mystery)
Personally, I think BBM's impact on the culture is already assured, and whether it won the Oscar or not wasn't going to make any difference to that. Most people will remember the movie long after Crash or any of the others. For someone who is interested in increased acceptance and respect for gays (as I am), it's already done its job, I believe.
The question of the just choice for Best Picture is another one entirely. I haven't seen Crash, but I am certainly willing to believe you that it's worthy.
My only problem is the idea that a movie might lose because people get sick of it being overhyped. Something feels wrong to me if a movie was good enough to win an Oscar a few weeks ago, but isn't anymore just because the Academy has heard too damn much about it lately. That seems extraordinarily shortsighted - letting the way you feel this morning dictate a decision that's supposed to stand forever, as to what was the Best Picture of the year. I know voters are only human, but if anyone does change their vote for reasons like that (no matter which movie they chose), I wish they would try to take a long view instead.
(mystery)
(mystery)