connielane: (attention)
Add MemoryShare This Entry
posted by [personal profile] connielane at 08:45am on 06/03/2006
[This post is not directed at anyone in particular. I've seen things all over the 'net about this, not just my flist.]

I may regret doing this, but never can I remember the words "Oscar upset" being more accurate than they were at the end of last night's Oscars, and I think some things need to be said.

First of all, I loved all five of the Best Picture nominees. I thought this was one of the strongest years in quite a while. I would have loved to have seen at least four of the five nominees take the "top" prize (Capote was the weakest, in my opinion, and that's saying a lot for the other four, because Capote was awesome). Brokeback clearly had all the momentum going in last night, but I knew Crash would be the dark horse.

There are a lot of things that go into whether a movie wins Best Picture or not, and many of them have nothing to do with the quality of the film. There are a lot of political machinations, campaigns, and what not, and if your movie peaks at the wrong time, it could mean people voting for something else.

I detest ranking art against art, but personally, if I had been given an opportunity to vote for the Oscars, I would have gone with Munich for Best Picture. I think it was the strongest "total package" of the five. Well written, well acted, beautifully shot, and very timely. But that's just me, and I knew that it was probably the least likely to take home anything, because it was so under-advertised. However, when it came to the two frontrunners, I felt there was a strong possibility for Brokeback NOT to win. In fact, if I had only had those two movies to choose from, I would have picked Crash over Brokeback myself (though it would have been a difficult choice).

For one thing, I think "Brokeback-mania" reached its saturation point too early and people were sick of it. "Brokeback" as a word is now a part of the cultural lexicon. You couldn't go anywhere without hearing a gay cowboy joke. In some ways, it kind of played itself out. Also, as great as I thought it was, it just didn't seem that revolutionary to me.

Crash was a different kind of underdog. It came out early in the year, and it's very rare for the Academy to remember anything that came out before Thanksgiving. It was a very divisive movie - there were people who really loved it and people who thought it was the cinematic antichrist. I think a few things put it ahead of Brokeback (though, I'd bet money that the race was quite close, if we could see the vote percentages).

1) It was an L.A. picture. Most Academy members are Angelinos, so this picture was bound to resonate with them.

2) It had a huge cast, many of them well-respected actors. Naturally, everyone in it who got to vote would vote for it. And - as a friend of mine pointed out - by voting for Crash, Academy members no doubt felt that they were rewarding as many of "their" people as possible.

3) As an "issues" movie, it was both more pointed and more universal. Preconception is perhaps the most basic problem we face as human beings. Brokeback dealt with this on a small level with homosexuality (i.e., the image of gay men was very non-stereotypical), but it was by no means the focus. This movie shook people and forced many of them to look at their own preconceptions of people. Even the casting of the movie was clearly designed to achieve this.


I'm not saying there aren't some homophobes in the Academy who thought the world wasn't ready for a Best Picture that put homosexuality front and center. But I seriously doubt they're numerous enough to have affected the vote that much. I find accusations that the Academy is somehow sending a message to the gay community - and even more incredibly, that they are condoning and perpetuating homophobia - by not rewarding Brokeback with Best Picture to be utterly ridiculous. And I'm saying this both to the people who are gloating that this is supposedly the case and the people who are angered by it. It's just. Not. True. Would anybody be saying the Academy was perpetuating racism if Crash had not won? Is Kanye West going to go on television and say that the Academy doesn't care about Jewish people because Munich didn't win?

NO!


It just means that there was another movie that people - people who make movies for a living, by the way - thought was better.
Mood:: 'irate' irate
There are 17 comments on this entry. (Reply.)
 
posted by [identity profile] ladyvorkosigan.livejournal.com at 06:31pm on 06/03/2006
I agree; if anything, I suspect for the Academy voters Crash might have been the more controversial choice because it challenged so many preconceptions generally liberal people have about race and social interactions.

I personally would have voted for BBM, because it hit me on an emotional level whereas Crash hit me on an intellectual one, but I can't say any of the voters made a bad choice. :-)
 
posted by [identity profile] edeainfj.livejournal.com at 07:06pm on 06/03/2006
While I'm unhappy (to put it mildly) that Crash beat BBM, I do agree that it's silly to claim that BBM lost because the Academy is homophobic. That's just ridiculous. Crash, quite simply, had more connections, as you said. To quote Jon Stewart: "Raise your hand if you weren't in Crash."
 
posted by [identity profile] harryswheezy.livejournal.com at 07:08pm on 06/03/2006
I really think Brokeback fatigue had a bit to do with it. The movie won almost everything leading up the Oscars, and it got so much attention in the past few months that it got old. When it was time for Best Picture to be announced, I almost turned off the tv and went to bed, because I just knew that Brokeback was going to win...and the predictability of it bored me (especially after all of the favored actors won in those categories...no upsets whatsoever). I was thrilled when Crash won, just because it was a surprise. This has nothing to do with the merits of performances, or the pictures. It just gets boring watching the same actors/movie winning award after award. I know that there were some members of the Academy that didn't vote for Brokeback specifically because it was "the gay cowboy movie", but I really think that a larger portion of Crash's voters were either tired of the media's constant Brokeback hype or felt "closer" to Crash with its large cast and L.A. setting.
 
posted by [identity profile] prettyveela.livejournal.com at 07:12pm on 06/03/2006
Thanks Pam! This post made me think more about it, and now I want to see Munich. :D
 
posted by [identity profile] prettyannamoon.livejournal.com at 07:24pm on 06/03/2006
Wow, are the horse race comparisons apt - I could see all of the best picture noms entering the Derby (they all sound like horse names anyway). And poor Brokeback definitely peaked too soon.

Thanks for writing this. I need to see Munich next.
 
posted by (anonymouse) at 07:38pm on 06/03/2006
It seems to me that going into these awards there were a lot of people on both sides of the sociopolitical aisle who were overthinking the process. In the weeks leading up to Brokeback's wide release, and again in the weeks leading up to the Oscars one was hard-pressed to find coverage that didn't tout that film's relevance and stereotype-smashing.

That was always my issue. Not that the film may or may not be relevant, but that so many on both sides wanted everyone to see just how relevant it was. The liberal view was that Brokeback challenged preconceptions and humanised homosexuality. The conservative view was the Brokeback pushed too hard for acceptance of homosexuality as a cultural norm. Somewhere someone decided to market the film as a love story of extreme importance to Society In General.

My post on Friday was trying to address that. Because, really, in the minds of so many people of all persuasions, Brokeback Mountain ceased being a movie and became a rallying standard. It wasn't a Matinee, it was the Dred Scot decision in film form. Ironically, that probably killed any chance it had at winning the Oscar. The Academy (from what I remember) has never liked its chosen films to be too popular.

Even more ironically, Crash's win may save the Acadamy Awards. Everyone hates a foregone conclusion, everyone loves a little surprise and a little triumph-of-the-underdog. I would bet there are others, like me, who have a slightly renewed interest in next year's Oscar Telecast simply because it seems like maybe they will still suprise us.

K
 
posted by [identity profile] angua9.livejournal.com at 07:40pm on 06/03/2006
Seriously, dude! Some people are acting like this is a slam at Brokeback Mountain. Ummm, out of all the dozens (hundreds?) of movies made this year, it just barely got edged out of being voted the BEST. Plus, it was voted the best in three categories, and one of the top five in (I think) five more.

In what world is that a negative message?


I couldn't help but be glad BBM and Houston lad Larry McMurtry won for scriptwriting, though. :)
aberration: NASA Webb image of the Carina nebula (Default)
posted by [personal profile] aberration at 08:32pm on 06/03/2006
You're all wrong.

The Academy is clearly pro-McCarthyism because Good Night and Good Luck didn't win.

Duh.
 
posted by (anonymouse) at 09:01pm on 06/03/2006
Seriously. To say Crash challenged any of our miss-conception or preconceptions about race is ridiculous. Crash was a flat out horrible if somewhat poignant film. It was wrongheaded about the exact issue it purportedly confronted -- attempting to depict a world where on everyone's tongue is a racial epithet is waiting to fly off, a world where there aren't such things as psychological motivations. The choice of Crash was the typical cop-out by self-congratulatory liberal to afraid to actually pick real cinema as art. As Haggis said, Art shouldn't reflect society, it should shape it; and Crash certainly didn't reflect anything but its own narrative flaws. If you enjoyed Crash as a message movie, or at some political level, then you clearly deserve to live in that society, where white guilt is assuaged every so often by an incredibly mediocre 'message movie'.
 
posted by [identity profile] connielane.livejournal.com at 09:10pm on 06/03/2006
Actually, she loves Crash quite a bit. :P
aberration: NASA Webb image of the Carina nebula (Default)
posted by [personal profile] aberration at 09:14pm on 06/03/2006
Yeah... I was being sarcastic on the point that the choice of a movie that was not Brokeback Mountain somehow indicates that the Academy is homophobic. Honestly? I've seen much less safe films with themes on homosexuality that were awarded by the Academy - like Boys Don't Cry, Monster, or even Capote for that matter, where it required much more to gain empathy from an audience than two men who were essentially hardworking and decent but torn apart by circumstance. I can't agree that any of the five nominees weren't "message movies" - with the possible exception of Capote.
 
posted by (anonymouse) at 09:31pm on 06/03/2006
Just to clarify, I'm not the anonymous who hated Crash. I'm the anonymous who hasn't seen Crash.

At least I haven't seen THIS Crash.

i did see the one where people have sex with leg wounds.

I didn't like that one so much.

K
 
posted by [identity profile] miss-celestine.livejournal.com at 09:54pm on 06/03/2006
Well... I don't know if I'm allowed to put in my two cents, because I haven't seen Crash... or Brokeback Mountain... but, um, perhaps Crash was simply a better movie than Brokeback? I know this is a totally naive way of viewing things, but my question is sincere, isn't it a plausible possibility?
 
posted by [identity profile] connielane.livejournal.com at 10:02pm on 06/03/2006
Oh certainly. I know Ebert and Roeper both picked it as the one they would name Best Picture if it were purely up to them, saying that it was just a better movie than the other four. I really hate ranking things, so I feel uncomfortable saying that either was better than the other, but I'm sure that most people who voted for it sincerely thought it was better.
 
posted by [identity profile] peachespig.livejournal.com at 10:56pm on 06/03/2006
Thanks for this, Pam. I have no strong emotional investement in the outcome of the Oscars myself, but everything you say sounds very sane and reasonable.

Personally, I think BBM's impact on the culture is already assured, and whether it won the Oscar or not wasn't going to make any difference to that. Most people will remember the movie long after Crash or any of the others. For someone who is interested in increased acceptance and respect for gays (as I am), it's already done its job, I believe.

The question of the just choice for Best Picture is another one entirely. I haven't seen Crash, but I am certainly willing to believe you that it's worthy.

My only problem is the idea that a movie might lose because people get sick of it being overhyped. Something feels wrong to me if a movie was good enough to win an Oscar a few weeks ago, but isn't anymore just because the Academy has heard too damn much about it lately. That seems extraordinarily shortsighted - letting the way you feel this morning dictate a decision that's supposed to stand forever, as to what was the Best Picture of the year. I know voters are only human, but if anyone does change their vote for reasons like that (no matter which movie they chose), I wish they would try to take a long view instead.
 
posted by [identity profile] lilac-bearry.livejournal.com at 11:43pm on 06/03/2006
Maybe something's wrong with me, because I still find Brokeback jokes hilarious. :)
 
posted by [identity profile] lilac-bearry.livejournal.com at 12:57am on 09/03/2006
Eh, now they're old. :D

March

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
    1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10 11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31