connielane: (movie theater (inglourious basterds))
posted by [personal profile] connielane at 12:41am on 10/03/2022
connielane: (i heart movies)
posted by [personal profile] connielane at 12:40am on 07/08/2021

Ann: How did your show go?
Henry: I killed them. And your gig?
Ann: I saved them.


This movie is not easy to talk about without spoiling things that would be much better experienced in the theater (or, in a couple of weeks, streaming) unspoiled, but I’ll do my best. I’ve only seen one other film of the director, Leos Carax — his 2012 film HOLY MOTORS, which I loved (it was on my Best of 2012 list) but which was also strange and hard to describe, like ANNETTE. He has a wonderful sense of the absurd and unreal that I found really compelling to watch, and his lead actor in that film (Denis Levant) was really good at grounding material that, in other hands, could have been truly ridiculous and unwatchable.

ANNETTE is playing with a lot of ideas, perhaps chief among them the notion of fame and how it can corrupt and consume. It is partially a love story, but not entirely, and this love story is not a “feel good” one. It is also a musical (or, perhaps more accurately, a rock opera), with music and lyrics by Ron and Russell Mael of my beloved Sparks (who also have a story credit and are having quite the moment this summer, with this movie and Edgar Wright’s documentary about them, THE SPARKS BROTHERS). But it’s not a song-song-song musical. A lot of the music is sung dialogue — a bit like THE UMBRELLAS OF CHERBOURG, though unlike that movie, not *all* of the dialogue is sung.

The movie starts rather charmingly with the opening number “So May We Start” (with what seems to be a clever play on “mais oui, mais oui, now start”), starting in a recording studio and transitioning into a rather breathtaking one-take tracking shot (reminiscent of the accordion scene in HOLY MOTORS). This is a very self-aware “you are about to watch a piece of fiction” introduction to the film, and it features Sparks, Leos Carax, stars Adam Driver, Marion Cotillard and Simon Helberg, and several others, seemingly as themselves just getting pumped to have a good time and entertain you. And then we segue into the story.

Adam Driver plays Henry, a provocative insult comic. Marion Cotillard plays Ann, an opera soprano. Both of them are on the rise in their respective careers, and they are in a relationship that has captured the public’s and the media’s attention, Despite being apparent opposites, they are very much in love, but from the very beginning you can sense something ominous. Early on, they sing the obviously titled “We Love Each Other So Much,” a love song that sounds a lot like a funeral dirge and that culminates in a frankly sexual moment that was much giggled over when the movie screened at Cannes a few weeks ago. They soon marry and have a child, who they name Annette, and eventually we learn that Annette has a special talent. And that’s where I’ll stop because part of the magic of this movie is the unexpected places it takes you and the unexpected tools it uses to tell its story.

Like many of Carax’s previous films, ANNETTE explores reality and artifice, and in many ways (and I swear I don't mean this the way it's going to sound) it resembles Shakespeare. It revels in its own artifice — the opening number resembles a chorus introducing the drama to come, or Puck addressing the audience in A Midsummer Night’s Dream — and it’s built like many of Shakespeare’s tragedies — everything comes to a head in Act III and progressively deteriorates from there to the tragic but inevitable end. There are many moments that are deliberately made to look fabricated, and I imagine some people will dismiss the movie entirely for this, not reasoning that these are conscious choices by the filmmaker meant to evoke a particular idea or feeling. This is one of the reasons to go into the movie as fresh as possible and not be put off by some particular detail or other that you may have heard out of context. This movie is an experience and one that wants you to think about it and talk about it, not just idly enjoy it as popcorn entertainment (nothing against popcorn entertainment, which I also dearly love, but this is quite a different endeavor).

All of the cast is great in this. Adam Driver in particular gives what may be his best performance to date. He and Marion Cotillard boldly sell these roles and take the absurd elements of the film (including one element that is especially absurd — you’ll know it when you see it) and ground them in reality. And if you've only ever seen Simon Helberg in The Big Bang Theory, he's a revelation here. The music is wonderful and is a great match for the tone of the movie. There are only a handful of songs that can exist on their own as songs; the rest of them are brief moments in the film and depend on the context of the film to feel complete (not a criticism at all). The movie is also gorgeous to look at, with some stunning visuals and interesting effects, as well as copious use of the color green.

The movie is in a few theaters now, and I would advocate seeing it that way if you can, and if you feel safe doing so -- it's a great film for immersing yourself. If not, it will be streaming on Amazon starting August 20 (for goodness sake, watch it on your big TV and not your phone). Oh, and stay for the credits.

If you’d like a taste of the movie before diving in, here’s a two-minute clip with the part of the opening number (the way Russell Mael dramatically turns to direct our attention to Driver and Cotillard coming down a staircase fills me with such joy, I can’t explain it), and about halfway through the clip it begins to show brief not-too-spoilery moments from the rest of the film (including a tease of Adam Driver’s bewtocks, if you’re into that kind of thing).

connielane: (movie theater (inglourious basterds))
posted by [personal profile] connielane at 12:39am on 01/12/2019
I'm dying to talk about this movie, but most social media isn't compatible with spoiler talk because there aren't cut tags. So LJ it is, and I'm just going to type for a bit, so when I link this on Facebook the preview doesn't cut into the spoilers below. So here we go...

SPOILERS

SPOILERS

SPOILERS

Cut for SPOILERS )
connielane: (Default)
I have seen more versions of this play than probably any other Shakespeare play except Hamlet. I am very familiar with the story and the dialogue (I usually reread a Shakespeare play before I see it, but I didn't feel the need to with this one). I love the pure confection and Italian countryside porn of the 90s Branagh version. I loved the lo-fi homemade version of Whedon's take (and the especially remarkable performance of Amy Acker). I enjoyed the SITP production a few years ago with Lily Rabe and Hamish Linklater (the one where I sat in front of Alan Rickman). I loved the Utah Shakespeare Festival production (of *several* years ago now), though I was "meh" on their Beatrice. I love this play, despite all the issues a modern lens brings to it (ugh, Claudio amirite?).

All that to say that last night I saw my absolute favorite production of this play. Period. The Public Theater made history this year by having its first ever all-black cast at the Delacorte Theater. I didn't know most of the actors beforehand, but I knew Danielle Brooks played someone called "Taystee" in Orange Is the New Black (which I've never seen). She apparently turned down other projects to do this because, as a black actress of a particular size, she never gets to do roles like this.

I'm going to spoil the heck of this because this production only runs for a couple more weeks and I suspect none of you will get a chance to see this. I'll obviously be spoiling the play, and if you have somehow missed the bajillion productions of this text, then that's on you.

Read more... )
connielane: (hp trio)
First, and most generally, believe the hype. It is phenomenal, truly. Even if you have read the playscript (of which there are two versions now available, the rehearsal version and the final version), you are still going to have your face rocked off. I am very curious to see what happens with the Tony nominations next week (HPCC *just* got in before the eligibility deadline). It's not exactly Eugene O'Neill or anything, but it's such an immersive, breathtaking experience, and I absolutely see what JKR meant when she said it could only have been done as a play. Just reading it doesn't compare. And a movie version, where everything is CGI, wouldn't have been nearly as impressive.

The best bits of you are -- have always been -- heroic in really quiet ways. )

I want to squee so hard about specifics, but I'd better not. :P (I will, however, happily answer any question I can, for those who are curious.)
connielane: (king)
posted by [personal profile] connielane at 05:59pm on 05/02/2018 under
Nearly six months later, and I finally finished my write-up.

Read more... )
Mood:: late
connielane: (atticus)
A lot has been going on lately, and I've been "vaguebooking" about it, but I realize not everyone is up on what has actually happened.

A recap, if you're interested (there's probably stuff I'm missing, but here is what I know, starting with a little context):

Read more... )

Anyway, lots of feelings right now. I'm tentatively planning on still going to Austin in December. Several BNAT regulars made their travel plans long before this and are planning to be there. There are conversations happening about having an alterna-BNAT at people's houses.

I'm just tired of things being crap. Remember when we thought 2016 was terrible?
Mood:: 'indescribable' indescribable
connielane: (Default)
So I went to see a play the other night. I've written many times about the process of acquiring free tickets to the Public Theater's Shakespeare in the Park productions, but this season's Julius Caesar has taken on a new significance in the past few days, and I should say things about the play itself.

How many ages hence shall this our lofty scene be acted over in states unborn and accents yet unknown. )
connielane: (king)
I had seriously planned to do a vlog this year instead of a long breathless post, and I took a bunch of video, but my taciturn nature led me to shoot a lot more things and places than people (not wanting to bother people, natch -- #shypeopleproblems) so while I do have more pictures than usual, I wasn't quite ready for a vlog. Maybe next year.

Also, for the first time in my BNAT-going history, I brought my phone into the room (for picture-taking only), but I think I only ended up with one picture over the whole 25.5 hours. Again, next year. Baby steps. :P

Read more... )

Thanks to Harry for letting me be part of this movie lovefest again. Thanks to David for giving me a place to crash. Thanks to the Drafthouse and Kristen Bell for making it all happen. And thanks to all my fellow BNAT-ers for the hugs and the discussions and the squees and OMG WE'RE GOING TO BE IN STAR WARS YOU GUYS!
connielane: (books are teh sexy)
posted by [personal profile] connielane at 04:06pm on 30/10/2016 under ,
For the third straight year I schlepped up to the Alamo Drafthouse in Yonkers for their annual horror marathon. I had been torn, because the Nitehawk had a pretty awesome lineup (which they announced well in advance), but the two events overlapped and I had to choose. Ultimately, the Nitehawk's event cost more than twice as much as the Drafthouse's and I decided to trust to the Alamo's surprise programming.

My expectations for awesomeness were somewhat lowered, since the programmer for the last two events was now the programmer for the Brooklyn location and wouldn't be involved. But it turns out I needn't have worried. As usual, they didn't announce the titles, letting us find out what we were seeing only when the title appeared on screen.

Read more... )

Another great year, and I wonder if the Brooklyn location will join the fun next October.

March

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
    1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10 11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31